Remember this? Remember how it angered us, since we really don’t care who Europe thought should be our president? Now it’s all making sense.
When things don’t make sense, one must look outside the box for the answers. Maybe I’m just a little slow, but when I heard the quote from Obama about the “fundamental transformation of the United States of America”, I really didn’t know what was meant - in terms of our daily lives. Now, two years into his hostile takeover, I’ve realized he was talking about transforming America, but not just into a socialist / welfare state. That’s been practically in place for some time. The transformation is from constitutional republic into a democracy, thereby making our wonderful constitution null and void. That is the evil that is taking place.
This latest “AHA!” moment came when considering his support for “democracy” in the Middle East. (Really strange, since democracy and shariah are totally incompatible. Shariah proponents will use democracy to implement shariah, but then democracy will cease to exist.) One part of me says we should support those wanting to be free from tyrannical dictators. The other part fears what the new government will look like. In my new libertarian mindset, I have reconciled that it is up to those people to decide for themselves. We just need to be prepared to defend ourselves against whatever they decide to do. And, furthermore, allow them to live with their decision…But I digress.
Many who question the policies and actions of this president reached some astute conclusions before I did, and this current one is no exception. But, many have focused only on the fact that these are Muslim majority countries and that he’s a Muslim. That’s between him and God. And I think it’s short-sighted and not giving enough credit to a silver spooned, ambitious ideologue. That’s when I felt it was time to go deeper.
Here’s a question (I ask a lot of questions): What does Obama have to gain by supporting democratic uprisings no matter who is leading? Answer: Someone or something has decided that now’s the time for global social change. But that’s really not enough. The continuation of the answer lies in Obama’s motivation. Is it even remotely inconceivable that Obama wouldn’t be more than happy to step in as the Secretary General of the United Nations? Hardly. Does Obama hold, in his heart of hearts, the opinion that America is the problem and needs to be brought down for equity to be achieved across the globe? Hasn’t he spoken and acted in such a manner? The Alinsky method, of which Obama was a model student AND TEACHER, says things have to be torn down to be rebuilt in the way desired. We’re seeing it before our eyes globally.
How better to assume his self-styled messianic stature than by supporting every faction that will, now or eventually, be the leaders of those countries? After all, barring a revolutionary effort from the American people to restore their constitution, the work of tearing America down will be complete or near complete by the end of this term, or certainly the second. But, why would he stop there? His whole life has been built around this idea. When you despise something, you take pride in contributing to its demise. He has skated to this position with hardly a bruise. There is still much to be done in the name of social and economic “justice.”
This scenario has been building for a long time (see many quotes by national and international power players here). David Rockefeller, a globalist who made his fortune in our capitalist system, but now apparently has decided that others shouldn’t be afforded those same opportunities, said that “”WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF A GLOBAL TRANSFORMATION. ALL WE NEED IS THE RIGHT MAJOR CRISIS AND THE NATIONS WILL ACCEPT THE NWO.” George Soros, arguably the most prolific supporter/facilitator of global communism said, ” The United States is the main obstacle to a stable and just world.” Now, with the obstinate America broken and battered, as planned, Obama can use his appointed position to fully implement the Soros Utopian socialist/communist order. With newfound”democracies” – or “open societies” as Soros likes to call them, Obama, in order to keep his lofty place among the worldwide masses, will do all he can to look like he supports them, even to his detriment here in America. Remember, President of the United States used to be the pinnacle of power. But when Obama’s done with it, it just may not be.
Who would have thought America could have gone so far so fast, that an elected president would deliberately preside over the weakening of America, and few even seem to really care? Don’t look for answers in the usual places. Glenn Beck has taught us to look behind the curtain. We are wise to heed that advice.
Filed under: 1, Founding principles, Uncategorized | Tagged: America, New world order, Obama, United Nations | 1 Comment »




